Skip to main content
Private access is opening up — request an invite
askFinz
Use case · For deal teams

AI for due diligence that stays consistent.

Inconsistency is the bug; a repeatable workflow is the fix. Run the same question set, source breadth and output length across every target in a pipeline, and keep each finding traceable to the document it came from.

04
Workspaces
04
Moves
02
Workflows
askFinz · deal teams
01Apply one rubric to every target
02Read the document room
03Check the public record
04Keep the trail
research·search·news·storage
one workflowone workspace
What you can do

Four moves, one workspace.

  1. 01
    Apply one rubric to every target
    Branch the same diligence question set per company so each gets the same depth — no target gets the thin treatment.
  2. 02
    Read the document room
    Upload the data-room files and search across them semantically; pull the clause or figure, not the 200-page PDF.
  3. 03
    Check the public record
    Sweep deduped news clusters for litigation, leadership churn and the stories that don't make the management deck.
  4. 04
    Keep the trail
    Every finding lands in versioned storage with its source attached — the diligence file defends itself in a later review.
Example workflows

What it looks like end to end.

Flow 01

Target screening sweep

Run a first-pass screen over a list of targets with one rubric. Each company gets the same five-question pass and the same length, so the comparison is apples-to-apples rather than whoever-had-time-to-dig.

Flow 02

Red-flag pass

Before the IC, run a focused red-flag pass — litigation, related-party transactions, going-concern language and adverse press — with each flag linked to the page or article that raised it.

Questions

Frequently asked.

Can askFinz read a data room?
Upload the data-room documents and they become a searchable index; you can ask questions across the whole set and get back the specific clause or figure with its source.
How does it keep diligence consistent across targets?
You run the same question set as a repeatable workflow, so every target gets the same rubric, source breadth and output length — consistency is enforced by the workflow, not by memory.
Is the output auditable?
Yes. Findings are stored with their source documents attached and versioned, so a reviewer can trace any conclusion back to the page it came from.
For deal teams
Put it to work.

Request private access and we'll walk through the workspaces this job runs on.

Request access

Browse the rest of the catalog at /apps.

Request access